Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emerged from Thursday's nuclear talks in Geneva with a familiar message: the United States must avoid "excessive demands" if diplomacy is to succeed.
Tehran has spent years enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels while simultaneously claiming peaceful intentions © Mena Today
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emerged from Thursday's nuclear talks in Geneva with a familiar message: the United States must avoid "excessive demands" if diplomacy is to succeed.
The statement, made during a call with his Egyptian counterpart Badr Abdelatty, is vintage Tehran, long on warnings, short on specifics.
Araghchi declared that diplomatic success depended on "seriousness and realism from the other side" and on avoiding "miscalculations." He notably declined to specify which American demands he considered excessive.
A convenient omission.
The Art of Appearing Reasonable
This is the Iranian playbook, refined over decades: present yourself as the aggrieved party, accuse the other side of unreasonableness, and deflect attention from your own refusal to make meaningful concessions. By calling American demands "excessive" without naming them, Tehran poisons the diplomatic atmosphere while maintaining plausible deniability.
The reality is straightforward. Washington's core demands, halting military nuclear development, ending ballistic missile expansion, and cutting off financing to regional proxies, are not excessive. They are the minimum conditions for regional stability.
Iran's track record speaks for itself. Tehran has spent years enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels while simultaneously claiming peaceful intentions. It has armed the Houthis, Hezbollah and Hamas, destabilizing Yemen, Lebanon and Gaza, while presenting itself at the negotiating table as a responsible state actor.
Araghchi's carefully worded statement ahead of upcoming talks in Vienna follows the same pattern: create the impression of flexibility while conceding nothing substantial.
What Washington Must Remember
As negotiations move to Vienna, the United States must resist the temptation to soften its position in exchange for Iranian goodwill gestures. History has shown repeatedly that Tehran trades tactical concessions for strategic gains, buying time, securing sanctions relief, and preserving the very capabilities that make it dangerous.
The message from Geneva is clear: Iran wants a deal on its own terms. Washington must ensure that any agreement serves the region's security, not Tehran's survival strategy.
The strategic intimacy between Xi Jinping and Iran is not an accident of diplomacy. It is a feature of a far more brutal design: a global system where massive Chinese trade surpluses weaken Western economies while financing instability abroad.
The U.N. human rights chief Volker Turk on Friday called for an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty in Iran, warning that dozens more people risk execution after the first death sentence linked to January mass protests was issued this week.
The United States and Iran made significant progress in talks on Thursday aimed at resolving a longstanding nuclear dispute and averting new U.S. strikes, mediator Oman said, amid Washington's large-scale military buildup in the Middle East.
To make this website run properly and to improve your experience, we use cookies. For more detailed information, please check our Cookie Policy.
Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
