Iran
The Islamic Republic and trust: An impossible combination
There is a mistake many still make when speaking about Iran. They turn the argument into theology, as if the central question were a religious word like taqiyya.
U.S. President Donald Trump has invited dozens of world leaders to join his Board of Peace, an initiative presented as a vehicle to end the war in Gaza and tackle wider regional conflicts. Many countries have responded positively. France will not.
Donald Trump and Emmanuel Macron © Mena Today
U.S. President Donald Trump has invited dozens of world leaders to join his Board of Peace, an initiative presented as a vehicle to end the war in Gaza and tackle wider regional conflicts. Many countries have responded positively.
France will not.
According to a source close to President Emmanuel Macron, Paris intends to decline the invitation. Not surprising. Macron has long cultivated a diplomacy where the spotlight matters as much as the substance. If France cannot be center stage, France prefers to stay offstage entirely.
Joining the Board of Peace would have meant sharing credit, influence, and visibility. It would have required accepting that others might lead, decide, or shape outcomes. That, clearly, is a step too far. Macron wants to conduct diplomacy solo, even when solo performances draw smaller and smaller audiences.
The irony is striking. France often lectures the world on multilateralism, dialogue, and collective solutions. Yet when a concrete multilateral framework emerges without Paris at the helm, enthusiasm suddenly fades. Principles become optional when prestige is not guaranteed.
The truth is less flattering but more telling: France’s diplomatic weight is no longer what it once was. Declining to join does not look like independence; it looks like irrelevance disguised as pride. While others sit at the table and try to shape outcomes, Paris chooses to comment from the sidelines.
In today’s fractured world, peace initiatives are judged by results, not by who gets the microphone. Refusing to participate because the spotlight is shared is not statesmanship. It is vanity. And vanity, in diplomacy, rarely delivers peace.
There is a mistake many still make when speaking about Iran. They turn the argument into theology, as if the central question were a religious word like taqiyya.
The first falsehood to clear away is this: what Israel and the United States are doing is not a war on Iran. It is a confrontation with the Islamic Republic, the dictatorship that has ruled Iran since 1979, oppressed its own citizens, and turned a civilization of enormous depth and distinction into the instrument of a theocratic project.
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan is devastated. Absolutely beside himself. On Tuesday, he took to the podium in Ankara to condemn Israel's "illegal political assassinations" of Iranian "statesmen and politicians."
To make this website run properly and to improve your experience, we use cookies. For more detailed information, please check our Cookie Policy.
Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.