Skip to main content

Iran's Foreign Minister sets conditions for peace, none of them are reasonable

1 min Mena Today

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Al Jazeera Wednesday that Tehran's position against nuclear weapons development would "not significantly change », while cautioning that new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei had yet to publicly express his own view on the matter.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi, Reuters/Umit Bektas

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi, Reuters/Umit Bektas

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Al Jazeera Wednesday that Tehran's position against nuclear weapons development would "not significantly change », while cautioning that new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei had yet to publicly express his own view on the matter.

The late Ali Khamenei had issued a fatwa in the early 2000s declaring nuclear weapons development forbidden under Islamic law, a position Western governments have long questioned given Iran's continued uranium enrichment activities.

On the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied gas normally flows, Araqchi signaled that Iran had no intention of returning to the pre-war status quo. Iran's parliament speaker had already declared the strait's situation would "never return to pre-war conditions."

Araqchi proposed that Gulf-bordering countries draft a new protocol for the strait after the war,  one aligned with Iranian and regional interests. Tehran shut the waterway at the start of the conflict, declaring it would "not allow a single litre of oil" to reach the US, Israel or their partners.

Civilian Casualties? Blame Washington

Asked about Iranian strikes hitting residential and commercial areas across the Gulf, Araqchi was unapologetic: "Wherever there were American forces, they were targeted. It is possible some of these places were near urban areas."

He acknowledged Gulf nations were "upset" by the strikes, but placed the blame "entirely with the US" for starting the war on February 28.

Araqchi said an end to the war was only conceivable if hostilities ceased permanently across the entire region and Iran received compensation for damages incurred, conditions that, given the current military situation, appear far from achievable.

In short: Iran wants peace on its own terms, a new Hormuz under its control and no accountability for striking civilian areas. The gap between Tehran and reality has rarely been wider.

By Nidar ElBeh and Reuters 

Related

Turkey

Erdogan signals Turkey's interest in full SCO membership

NATO member Turkey would consider taking its relations with the China and Russia-led security bloc, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, to a higher level, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday.

Iran

The lull is over: US and Iran strike each other again

The U.S. and Iran found themselves back in a war footing on Wednesday after the most significant exchange in weeks, with Washington threatening even more devastating strikes while Iran protested an attack that it said killed five and wounded dozens of civilians at a wedding.

Syria

Nuclear watchdog: Progress with Syria, stalemate with Iran

The U.N. nuclear watchdog has resolved its outstanding questions from an investigation into secret nuclear activities in Syria under the Assad family's rule but made no progress in Iran, it said on Tuesday in confidential reports seen by Reuters.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Mena banner 4

To make this website run properly and to improve your experience, we use cookies. For more detailed information, please check our Cookie Policy.

  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.