The United Nations warned on Tuesday that any delay in Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon constitutes a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which served as the basis for the ceasefire agreement that took effect on November 27.
The Israeli military has made it clear that it will only withdraw from certain positions in southern Lebanon if there is concrete evidence that Hezbollah militants have also pulled back © TOL
The United Nations warned on Tuesday that any delay in Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon constitutes a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which served as the basis for the ceasefire agreement that took effect on November 27.
In a joint statement, the UN envoy to Lebanon and UN peacekeeping forces (UNIFIL) stressed:
“Today marks the deadline for the withdrawal of the Israeli army and the parallel deployment of Lebanese armed forces in positions across southern Lebanon.”
“Another delay in this process is not what we had hoped for, especially as it continues to violate UN Security Council Resolution 1701.”
However, such a statement seems almost laughable, given that since 2006, the UN has done nothing to prevent Hezbollah from transforming the border region into a heavily fortified military zone.
In this context, Israel is exercising legitimate caution. While the UN criticizes the Israeli withdrawal, it conveniently ignores Hezbollah’s entrenchment in the area, where the Iranian-backed group has stockpiled advanced weaponry and built underground military infrastructure—all in direct violation of the same Resolution 1701.
The Israeli military has made it clear that it will only withdraw from certain positions in southern Lebanon if there is concrete evidence that Hezbollah militants have also pulled back. Without such assurances, Israel risks ceding territory to an armed force that has repeatedly called for its destruction.
While the UN continues to issue empty warnings, the reality on the ground remains unchanged: Hezbollah, not Israel, is the true violator of Resolution 1701—and yet, the international community remains silent.
By Philippe Tanios
Israel struck Beirut on Wednesday for the first time since agreeing to a ceasefire with Hezbollah last month, with Israel saying it targeted a commander of the militant group's elite Radwan force in the city's southern suburbs.
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said it is premature to talk of any high-level meeting between Lebanon and Israel, comments underlining the dim chances of one being held soon as hoped for by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Lebanon's Maronite bishops have thrown their weight behind the ongoing Lebanon-Israel negotiation process, declaring that direct talks could help "consolidate security and stability" in the country, and delivering a stinging indictment of the path that Hezbollah's strategy has led Lebanon down for decades.
To make this website run properly and to improve your experience, we use cookies. For more detailed information, please check our Cookie Policy.
Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.