The Israeli military withdrawal from two "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon, scheduled under last Friday's framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel, has been postponed until both sides agree on a "joint supervision mechanism," Israeli Channel 11 reported.
The delay centres on the establishment of the Military Coordination Group for Lebanon (MCG4L), a body provided for in a "security annex" signed alongside the main framework agreement.
The MCG4L is designed to operate around the clock, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to manage "deconfliction, verification and overall implementation" of the framework between the Lebanese and Israeli armies.
In short: before Israeli boots leave Lebanese soil in the pilot zones, both militaries need to agree on who watches whom, how, and under what rules.
The delay is not unexpected. Framework agreements of this complexity rarely translate immediately into clean implementation on the ground.
The security annex itself signals that both parties anticipated the need for a structured military-to-military channel before any significant troop movements could begin.
For Lebanon, which has staked considerable political capital on the Washington framework as a path to full sovereignty, the pace of implementation will be closely watched, both by supporters who see it as a historic opportunity and by Hezbollah, which remains opposed and will be looking for any sign that the process is stalling.